We know the expert is sitting in front of the laptop. Not inside it. eety is here to handle the execution; so you can stay focused on the judgment that only you can provide.
There is a type of junior associate that takes your instructions, disappears for two hours, and comes back with something that has nothing to do with what you asked. You know the type. eety is not that. It knows its place in the room. It handles the drafting; you handle the thinking that actually matters.
Takes your instructions then quietly makes its own calls on strategy, scope, and what gets emphasised
Fills gaps with guesses; never tells you it guessed
Hands you a finished document you had no hand in shaping; now you have to fix it
Writes in a voice that sounds like no attorney who has ever filed a patent
Treats the attorney as an obstacle between the AI and the output
Reads your intent; stops and asks when something is ambiguous rather than filling it in
Flags knowledge gaps with a specific question; not a vague prompt to review the output
Pauses at every decision point; you approve, redirect, or push forward. Nothing moves without you
Learns your voice from a patent you already like; and writes the next one to sound like you wrote it
Understands one thing clearly: you are the professional. It is the assistant.
Claim scope, prosecution angle, what to emphasise and what to hold back; those are judgment calls that belong to you. eety executes the brief; it does not write it. The expert is in the chair, not in the model.
A patent with a wrong assumption baked in is worse than a blank page. You find out from the examiner, not from the tool. So eety stops at every gap; asks a specific technical question; and waits for your answer before it moves on.
Your clients hired you; not a tool. So if a colleague read this draft, it should be indistinguishable from something you wrote on a good day. eety learns your patterns from a reference patent; and writes every draft in that same voice.
It follows your lead — and gives you a heads up before there's a problem.
No ego. No pushback. Just “how do you want it done?”
Every revision starts with your direction. It never decides for you.
The years you spent building expertise in this field matter. eety is here to make sure that expertise reaches more clients, faster; without the parts that should not need your time.
Try it outI once asked a tool to explain what was novel about an invention I had just uploaded. It gave me a paragraph. A very well-written, structurally sound paragraph. Which was, essentially, just the first three sentences of the inventor's email; rearranged. The tool had not understood the patent. It had understood the pattern of patent writing. These are not the same thing... not even close.
eety builds a living, evolving model of your invention; mapping components, tracing interactions, identifying what is genuinely novel, and flagging exactly where the gaps are.
Drop in any format; invention disclosures, technical specs, research papers, even rough inventor notes. A good engineer doesn't refuse to read a napkin sketch. Neither does eety.
Every file goes through a 15-dimension extraction; from inventive concept and novelty to component-level interaction mapping. Not keyword matching. Genuine comprehension of what this thing actually does and why no one has done it before.
After the initial pass, eety identifies what it still doesn't know and asks you. Not generic questions; targeted ones. Framed like an engineer who is trying to actually build this. Each answer deepens understanding surgically; nothing already solid gets touched.
Inventive Concept
What is fundamentally new
Technical Problem
The pain point being solved
Solution Mechanism
How it actually works
Novelty Assessment
What distinguishes from prior art
Non-Obviousness
Why it's not trivially derived
Component Mapping
Every element decomposed
Interaction Tracing
How components relate
Domain Classification
Technical field identification
Advantages
Key benefits articulated
Use Cases
Practical applications identified
Alternative Embodiments
Different ways to implement
Terminology Mapping
Key terms and definitions
Gap Detection
Missing information flagged
Preliminary Claims
Initial claim scope framing
After the initial pass, eety identifies the knowledge gaps and asks 3 to 5 targeted technical questions. These are not generic. They are specific to your invention; framed by someone who is trying to build it from scratch and has hit a wall.
Q1: How does the system distinguish between a vertical acceleration spike caused by a road hazard versus user handling events (e.g., dropping the phone)?
Q2: What is the minimum threshold of unique device reports required within a geospatial radius before confirming a hazard as validated?
Q3: Does the Visual Screening Module utilize a circular buffer to retroactively save frames from the moment preceding the accelerometer spike?
Every dimension gets a confidence level. So you know exactly where the understanding is solid and where the inventor still needs to fill a gap. No false confidence; no hidden uncertainty.
Not a static analysis. The understanding grows with every answer, every document, every piece of prior art; feeding downstream into claims, specification, and drawings.
Upload multiple files; disclosures, prior art, technical specs. The brain merges them, resolves conflicts, fills gaps, and re-ranks novelty into a single unified model.
New information computes a precise delta; only changed fields update. What's already solid stays untouched. Zero wasted context.
Every insight traces back to its source chunk. You can see exactly which sentence in which document produced each understanding field. No black boxes.
Upload inventor videos and audio recordings. The brain transcribes, analyzes, and extracts technical understanding the same way it does with documents.
No prompts to memorise. No templates to fill. Just say what you want; eety figures out what that means and does it.
"I want to own everything here"
→ Broadest possible claim scope, functional language
"ASAP — file provisionally"
→ Speed mode; lean draft, gets the date locked
"What's the prior art landscape?"
→ Prior art analysis runs first, then we draft
"Good bones — needs polish"
→ Iterates surgically; nothing good gets touched
"That figure is wrong, redo it"
→ Regenerates the specific figure, keeps the rest
"Ship it — export everything"
→ DOCX out; jurisdiction-correct formatting
Drawings are not optional. They are mandatory; and getting them wrong costs your client a rejection. eety generates them from your invention understanding; correct numerals, right format, aligned to your claims. You review. You approve. It handles the rest.
System Block Diagram
Type #16 of 33
Method Flowchart
Type #17 of 33
Network / Protocol Diagram
Type #21 of 33
eety understands 33 distinct figure types — from semiconductor cross-sections and state machines to exploded assemblies, botanical drawings, UI screen diagrams, and chemical structures. It selects the right type for each part of your invention automatically.
Semiconductor Cross-Section
Type #29 of 33
State Machine Diagram
Type #18 of 33
Exploded Assembly View
Type #4 of 33
Drawings generated to USPTO, EPO, UKIPO, WIPO, or IPO standards. Pick your office; eety applies the correct rules automatically.
"Remove the barcode from Fig 2" — eety regenerates with your feedback in seconds, not hours.
Reference numerals tracked across all figures. Element 102 in Fig. 1 stays 102 everywhere; renumbering ripples automatically.
Every figure is rendered as a clean SVG; infinitely scalable, print-ready, and editable. No raster artifacts at USPTO resolution.
eety decides what type each figure should be; block diagram, flowchart, schematic, state machine; based on what the invention actually needs.
Add a new figure and the Brief Description of Drawings updates automatically. Every reference numeral inserted, every section kept in sync.
Most inventors walk in with something. A photo of the whiteboard. A tablet sketch. An old diagram from a slide deck. They hand it to you expecting it to end up in the application. Until now, that was your problem to solve manually.
Upload whatever they gave you; eety reads the topology, identifies the components, maps the reference numbers, and redraws it as a compliant patent figure. It asks before acting; you approve or redirect before anything changes.
Upload a rough sketch or informal drawing in any format
eety classifies it as formal or informal; asks before acting
Approve the redraw plan, or keep your drawing as-is
Formal output meets your target office's drawing standards
No other AI patent drafting tool reads your drawings. This is not a small thing.
It is 11pm. You have been staring at this draft for three hours. Reference numeral 106 is in Fig. 3; you are almost certain it is mentioned in the description. Almost. You scroll back through six pages and convince yourself it is there. It is not. The examiner finds it in week four.
The Verifier removes that moment. Every numeral in every figure; colour-coded by whether it appears in the specification. Every claim term; highlighted wherever it has written description support. The review you would have done if you had another hour; done in seconds.
Every reference numeral in every figure, color-coded by match status. Red means it's missing from the description. One click to jump to the gap.
Select a claim; every matching phrase highlights in the Detailed Description. Instantly see which claim terms have written description support and which need it.
Reformatting a US draft for EPO or Indian filing is one of those tasks that looks quick and turns out not to be. Different required sections. Different claim conventions. Different compliance risks. Different reviewers catching different things.
eety generates a structurally and linguistically correct document for your target office from the very first word. The India template opens with Field of Invention and closes with "I/We Claim." The EPO Two-Part template uses "characterised in that." You do not have to remember; eety already does.
US Standard
USPTO · 35 USC
Continuation
USPTO · § 120
CIP + Provisional
USPTO · 2 types
EP One-Part
EPO · EPC Art. 84
EP Two-Part
EPO · characterised in that
PCT Standard
WIPO · Chapter I
PCT Software/AI
WIPO · technical effect
UK Standard
UKIPO · 2 types
India Complete
IPO · Form 2
11 templates · 5 patent offices · jurisdiction-correct from the first word
Every attorney has a way of framing a preamble. A preference for how embodiments are introduced. A level of hedging that is exactly right for the way they practise. That is not style; that is professional identity. Upload one patent you already like; eety reads it and writes the next one to match.
Style Library New
Save a style profile once; apply it to every new matter in one click. Firms with a house style no longer need to re-upload the reference patent each time. Your writing DNA, stored and reused.
The first time you review an eety draft, it should feel different from what you expect. Not because it is perfect; but because the work that usually falls to you has already been handled properly.
Extracting inventive concepts, technical problems, and solution mechanisms.
Resolving conflicts across sources, producing unified invention comprehension.
Element-by-element comparison, novelty arguments, and design-around strategies.
Reverse-engineering writing DNA from your reference patent; section by section.
Paragraph-by-paragraph roadmap with topics, figure refs, and cross-section dependencies.
Patent prose drafted step-by-step with claim alignment and style enforcement.
Determining figures, visualization types, and reference numeral schemes.
AI-generated patent drawings; block diagrams, flowcharts, and system schematics.
Figure-by-figure narrative with claim traceability and enablement checks.
Multi-pass review; section by section, claim by claim, figure by figure. Every annotation cites the correct legal authority for your jurisdiction. Then The Verifier runs. Then clean DOCX export.
Not a generic chatbot window. Document editor, AI assistant, drawings, and analysis; all in one real-time interface.
Rich Document Editor
AI Chat Assistant
Drawings Gallery
Real-Time Progress
Track Changes
One-Click Export
Understanding Panel
Style Profiler
The Verifier
Style Library
Drawing Upload
In-App Support
Collaboration
Jobs Panel
Green dot = added since launch
Start with 5 free patent drafts. No credit card required.
20 Patent Applications
$699
billed once · 20 applications
50 Patent Applications
$1,499
billed once · 50 applications
100 Patent Applications
$2,499
billed once · 100 applications
No public URLs, no third-party access to your files.
Complete data isolation with JWT-based access control.
Every action and draft version logged with full history.
Your patent applications are never used to train AI models.