eety.ai — AI Patent Drafting Assistant for Law Firms

Our Philosophy

We didn't build an AI that thinks it knows better than you.

There is a type of junior associate that takes your instructions, disappears for two hours, and comes back with something that has nothing to do with what you asked. You know the type. eety is not that. It asks when it is unsure. It waits when it needs direction. It executes exactly what you instruct; the way a brilliant junior would on their very best day.

eety.ai — Patent attorney working alongside AI assistant, illustrating the assistant philosophy where you lead and eety executes

The Agent Approach

Takes your instructions and makes its own decisions about strategy, scope, and execution; whether you wanted that or not

Guesses when it hits a gap. Does not tell you it guessed.

Presents completed work you had no hand in shaping; hope you like what it decided

Writes in its own voice; generic, interchangeable, unmistakably not yours

Implicitly says: "I can do your job"

The eety Approach

✓

Understands your intent and asks when it's unsure; never assumes your strategy

✓

Identifies every gap and asks a focused technical question to fill it; not a vague one

✓

Waits for your direction at each step; you approve, modify, or redirect before it proceeds

✓

Writes in your voice; your style, your hedging patterns, your formality level

✓

Knows that "You're the expert. I'm here to make you faster."

🎯

You Set the Strategy

eety doesn't decide claim scope, prosecution angles, or drafting priorities. You do. It executes what you instruct; the way a brilliant junior associate would on their very best day. The strategy is always yours.

❓

It Asks, Never Assumes

When the understanding is incomplete, eety stops and asks a focused technical question. It does not fill the gap with a guess. Because one wrong assumption in a patent application can cost your client millions; and you do not find out until the examiner tells you.

✍️

Your Voice, Every Time

If a colleague read the output, it should sound like you wrote it; not like someone fed your instructions into a chatbot. eety reverse-engineers your writing DNA from a reference patent and drafts in that exact voice. It is either yours or it is wrong.

How It Feels

It listens. It defers. It delivers.

These claims are too narrow. Cast the widest net.

It follows your lead — and gives you a heads up before there's a problem.

This is rubbish. Start over.

No ego. No pushback. Just “how do you want it done?”

Good bones. Tighten the dependent claims and add one more on the data pipeline.

Every revision starts with your direction. It never decides for you.

You passed the bar. You built the expertise. eety just makes sure that expertise ships faster;
without anyone cutting corners on your behalf.

Try it out

The Brain

It doesn't read your disclosure. It understands your invention.

I once asked a tool to explain what was novel about an invention I had just uploaded. It gave me a paragraph. A very well-written, structurally sound paragraph. Which was, essentially, just the first three sentences of the inventor's email; rearranged. The tool had not understood the patent. It had understood the pattern of patent writing. These are not the same thing... not even close.

eety builds a living, evolving model of your invention; mapping components, tracing interactions, identifying what is genuinely novel, and flagging exactly where the gaps are.

eety.ai — The Brain engine analyzing patent invention disclosures across 15 technical dimensions including novelty, component mapping, and gap detection

Upload & Parse

Drop in any format; invention disclosures, technical specs, research papers, even rough inventor notes. A good engineer doesn't refuse to read a napkin sketch. Neither does eety.

PDF DOCX TXT Images

→

15-Point Deep Analysis

Every file goes through a 15-dimension extraction; from inventive concept and novelty to component-level interaction mapping. Not keyword matching. Genuine comprehension of what this thing actually does and why no one has done it before.

~30 seconds per document

→

Iterative Refinement

After the initial pass, eety identifies what it still doesn't know and asks you. Not generic questions; targeted ones. Framed like an engineer who is trying to actually build this. Each answer deepens understanding surgically; nothing already solid gets touched.

Surgical delta updates, not full rewrites

What the Brain Extracts

15 dimensions. One disclosure. Everything eety needs.

Inventive Concept

What is fundamentally new

Technical Problem

The pain point being solved

Solution Mechanism

How it actually works

Novelty Assessment

What distinguishes from prior art

Non-Obviousness

Why it's not trivially derived

Component Mapping

Every element decomposed

Interaction Tracing

How components relate

Domain Classification

Technical field identification

Advantages

Key benefits articulated

Use Cases

Practical applications identified

Alternative Embodiments

Different ways to implement

Terminology Mapping

Key terms and definitions

Gap Detection

Missing information flagged

Preliminary Claims

Initial claim scope framing

Inventor Interview

Questions an engineer would ask before building.

After the initial pass, eety identifies the knowledge gaps and asks 3 to 5 targeted technical questions. These are not generic. They are specific to your invention; framed by someone who is trying to build it from scratch and has hit a wall.

Q1: How does the system distinguish between a vertical acceleration spike caused by a road hazard versus user handling events (e.g., dropping the phone)?

Q2: What is the minimum threshold of unique device reports required within a geospatial radius before confirming a hazard as validated?

Q3: Does the Visual Screening Module utilize a circular buffer to retroactively save frames from the moment preceding the accelerometer spike?

Confidence Scoring

Every dimension gets a confidence level. So you know exactly where the understanding is solid and where the inventor still needs to fill a gap. No false confidence; no hidden uncertainty.

Inventive Concept95%

Component Mapping88%

Alternative Embodiments62%

Non-Obviousness55%

Living Mental Model

Not a static analysis. The understanding grows with every answer, every document, every piece of prior art; feeding downstream into claims, specification, and drawings.

Multi-Source Merge

Upload multiple files; disclosures, prior art, technical specs. The brain merges them, resolves conflicts, fills gaps, and re-ranks novelty into a single unified model.

Surgical, Not Destructive

New information computes a precise delta; only changed fields update. What's already solid stays untouched. Zero wasted context.

New

Source Grounding

Every insight traces back to its source chunk. You can see exactly which sentence in which document produced each understanding field. No black boxes.

New

Media Intelligence

Upload inventor videos and audio recordings. The brain transcribes, analyzes, and extracts technical understanding the same way it does with documents.

Natural Communication

Talk to it the way you talk to people.

No prompts to memorise. No templates to fill. Just say what you want; eety figures out what that means and does it.

Cast the widest net on the independent claims.

I'll draft broad independent claims using functional language with minimum structural elements. Focusing on maximizing scope while maintaining defensibility.

These claims are rubbish. Start over.

Understood — redrafting from scratch. Broadening the preamble and restructuring the element hierarchy with a fresh approach.

"I want to own everything here"

→ Broadest possible claim scope, functional language

"ASAP — file provisionally"

→ Speed mode; lean draft, gets the date locked

"What's the prior art landscape?"

→ Prior art analysis runs first, then we draft

"Good bones — needs polish"

→ Iterates surgically; nothing good gets touched

"That figure is wrong, redo it"

→ Regenerates the specific figure, keeps the rest

"Ship it — export everything"

→ DOCX out; jurisdiction-correct formatting

Patent Drawings

The first tool that actually draws.

Most AI patent tools stop at the text. eety generates the figures too; block diagrams, flowcharts, schematics; aligned with your claims, built from your invention, refined by your feedback.

eety.ai — Automatically generated patent drawings including block diagrams, flowcharts, and system schematics derived directly from the invention model

Fig. 1

System Block Diagram

Fig. 2

Method Flowchart

Fig. 3

Network Architecture

Jurisdiction-Aware

Drawings generated to USPTO, EPO, UKIPO, WIPO, or IPO standards. Pick your office; eety applies the correct rules automatically.

Iterative Feedback

"Remove the barcode from Fig 2" — eety regenerates with your feedback in seconds, not hours.

Cross-Figure Consistency

Reference numerals tracked across all figures. Element 102 in Fig. 1 stays 102 everywhere; renumbering ripples automatically.

New

SVG Precision

Every figure is rendered as a clean SVG; infinitely scalable, print-ready, and editable. No raster artifacts at USPTO resolution.

New

Figure Type Intelligence

eety decides what type each figure should be; block diagram, flowchart, schematic, state machine; based on what the invention actually needs.

New

Auto Brief Description

Add a new figure and the Brief Description of Drawings updates automatically. Every reference numeral inserted, every section kept in sync.

Only on eety

Bring Your Own Drawings

Your rough sketch.
A formal patent figure.

Most inventors have a drawing. It's on a napkin, a whiteboard photo, a tablet sketch with chicken-scratch labels. No other tool knows what to do with it. eety does.

Upload your sketch; eety reads the topology, identifies the components, maps your scrawled reference numbers, and redraws it as a clean, compliant patent figure. The invention context it already understands fills in the gaps your sketch leaves behind.

✓

Upload a rough sketch or informal drawing in any format

✓

eety classifies it as formal or informal; asks before acting

✓

Approve the redraw plan, or keep your drawing as-is

✓

Formal output meets your target office's drawing standards

No other AI patent drafting tool reads your drawings. This is not a small thing.

eety.ai — Bring Your Own Drawings: rough inventor sketch on the left transformed into a formal USPTO-compliant patent figure on the right

Quality Assurance

The Verifier

The thing examiners
catch that you miss at 2am.

Reference numeral errors are the most common reason a patent examiner returns a drawing package. Numeral 106 appears in the figure; nowhere in the description. The examiner notices. You don't. Not at 11pm on a filing deadline.

The Verifier runs two checks automatically. The Figure Verifier cross-references every numeral in every figure against every mention in the specification. The Claims Verifier highlights every claim term in the Detailed Description; so you can see instantly where claim language has support and where it doesn't.

🔢

Figure Verifier

Every reference numeral in every figure, color-coded by match status. Red means it's missing from the description. One click to jump to the gap.

📋

Claims Verifier

Select a claim; every matching phrase highlights in the Detailed Description. Instantly see which claim terms have written description support and which need it.

Multi-Jurisdiction

One invention.
Filed everywhere.

Pick India at project creation and the workspace shows Field of Invention, Objects of Invention, and Best Method as required sections; the claims close with "I/We Claim"; the review flags Section 3(k) and 3(d) risks. Pick EPO Two-Part and claims open with a preamble plus "characterised in that"; the review cites EPC Article 84.

No other AI drafting tool does this natively. Most produce a US-style document and leave the reformatting to you. eety generates a structurally, linguistically, and compliance-wise correct document for your target office from the first word.

🇺🇸

US Standard

USPTO · 35 USC

🇺🇸

Continuation

USPTO · § 120

🇺🇸

CIP + Provisional

USPTO · 2 types

🇪🇺

EP One-Part

EPO · EPC Art. 84

🇪🇺

EP Two-Part

EPO · characterised in that

🌍

PCT Standard

WIPO · Chapter I

🌍

PCT Software/AI

WIPO · technical effect

🇬🇧

UK Standard

UKIPO · 2 types

🇮🇳

India Complete

IPO · Form 2

11 templates · 5 patent offices · jurisdiction-correct from the first word

eety.ai — Multi-Jurisdiction support: USPTO, EPO, UKIPO, WIPO, and IPO all connected to the eety.ai hub across a world map

Style Intelligence

Sounds like you.
Not like AI.

Every attorney has a voice. A specific way of structuring a preamble. A preference for how embodiments are introduced. A level of hedging that is just right; not too cautious, not too exposed. Upload one patent you like the sound of; eety figures out the rest. The next application comes out sounding like you wrote it on a good day.

Sentence Structure Hedging Patterns Claim Formatting Embodiment Framing Admission Risk Terminology Control Style Library ✦

Style Library New

Save a style profile once; apply it to every new matter in one click. Firms with a house style no longer need to re-upload the reference patent each time. Your writing DNA, stored and reused.

Standard Operating Procedure

The 10-Phase Drafting Pipeline

Most drafting tools produce a first draft. eety produces a first-quality draft. There is a difference; and you will feel it the first time you review the output.

eety.ai — Complete 10-phase intelligent patent drafting pipeline, from disclosure upload through AI analysis and drawing generation to final DOCX export

Disclosure Analysis

Extracting inventive concepts, technical problems, and solution mechanisms.

Understanding Merge

Resolving conflicts across sources, producing unified invention comprehension.

Prior Art Analysis

Element-by-element comparison, novelty arguments, and design-around strategies.

Style Profile Extraction

Reverse-engineering writing DNA from your reference patent; section by section.

Draft Planning

Paragraph-by-paragraph roadmap with topics, figure refs, and cross-section dependencies.

Section Drafting

Patent prose drafted step-by-step with claim alignment and style enforcement.

Drawing Plan

Determining figures, visualization types, and reference numeral schemes.

Figure Generation

AI-generated patent drawings; block diagrams, flowcharts, and system schematics.

Detailed Description

Figure-by-figure narrative with claim traceability and enablement checks.

Review Pipeline & Export

Multi-pass review; section by section, claim by claim, figure by figure. Every annotation cites the correct legal authority for your jurisdiction. Then The Verifier runs. Then clean DOCX export.

Purpose-Built Environment

Your patent workspace

Not a generic chatbot window. Document editor, AI assistant, drawings, and analysis; all in one real-time interface.

📝

Rich Document Editor

💬

AI Chat Assistant

🖼️

Drawings Gallery

📊

Real-Time Progress

🔄

Track Changes

📤

One-Click Export

🧠

Understanding Panel

🎨

Style Profiler

🔢

The Verifier

📚

Style Library

✏️

Drawing Upload

🎫

In-App Support

👥

Collaboration

⚙️

Jobs Panel

Green dot = added since launch

Inaugural Launch

Simple, transparent pricing

Start with 5 free patent drafts. No credit card required.

Every new user gets 5 FREE patent applications; no credit card required

1 Month

20 Patent Applications

$34.95 per patent

$699

billed once · 20 applications

Full 10-phase drafting pipeline
AI-generated patent drawings
Style intelligence matching
USPTO-compliant DOCX export
Email support

Get Started

Best Value

3 Months

75 Patent Applications

$26.65 per patent

$1,999

billed once · 75 applications

Everything in 1 Month plan
Priority AI processing
Multi-reference style profiling
Advanced prior art analysis
Priority support